Design and Inquiry IA Criterion C

Table Of Content

• Guidelines
• This section focuses on producing a plan in enough detail to manufacture the prototype.
• Examples of rooms and areas in covered units for which it is mandatory to offer certain design features
• For Multifamily Residential
• Strand C.4 – Justify Changes Made to the Plan

The plan’s language can be a mixture of text, symbols, images, and sketches. Think about the instructions you’d receive to build a set of shelves. What about folding an origami crane or building a model airplane? Good plans are a coherent mix of step-by-step instructions with clear illustrations. A flow chart or a PERT chart could be used to show logical steps. WBDG is a gateway to up-to-date information on integrated 'whole building' design techniques and technologies.

Guidelines

Other Planning Documents - The City of Red Deer

Other Planning Documents.

Posted: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:05:16 GMT [source]

Assessing Criterion C is done across all four strands. It’s important to provide feedback early so that any misconceptions can be cleared up to ensure future success. Strands C.2 and/or C.3 can wind up being a series of process photos for physical product designs. Ensure students know how to use their device cameras and have some skills in image editing.

This section focuses on producing a plan in enough detail to manufacture the prototype.

To this end, the Citywide Design Guidelines have been created to carry out the common design objectives that maintain neighborhood form and character while promoting design excellence and creative infill development solutions. For the Water Tank Engineering with Newspaper unit, the students addressed C.2 and C.3 simultaneously. The step-by-step photographic evidence of the build offered direct evidence of technical skill level (Strand C.2). The photos also showed how the student followed the plan to create the solution (Strand C.3).

Examples of rooms and areas in covered units for which it is mandatory to offer certain design features

They are as ready as ever to show what they know to be an effective solution to the problem. This setup is essentially an advance organizer to provide students with organizational cues.

Additionally, screenshots of how the project looks within the app or software can serve as a demonstration of excellent technical skills for digital designs. For example, when learning to animate with Adobe Photoshop, my students submitted screenshots of their Animation and Layers Windows. The animation frames show the timing and sequence decisions of the layers to be shown. The Layers Window nomenclature can reveal decisions about organization choices. Once the design criteria have been established, it’s important to put them to use.

Finally, Criterion B‘s design specifications may be calling out for requirements that require excellent technical skills. Regardless, make sure to keep in mind the design specifications when determining how you want your students to demonstrate excellent technical skills when making the solution. Why take lots of photos throughout the building process? Because students will more easily know if they followed the plan to create the solution (Strand C.3 requirement). They will also be better set up to expertly and accurately justify any changes made to the plan (Strand C.4 requirement).

Any discrepancies or differences created in the translation are not binding and have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement purposes. If any questions arise related to the information contained in the translated website, please refer to the English version. States one change made to the chosen design or plan when making the solution.

Change orders officially record an amendment to the original construction contract. Safety should always be fundamental to creating physical products. Pointy scissors, hot glue guns, and hacksaws can be dangerous! However, unless you are assessing safety as part of Strand C.2 – Demonstrate Excellent Technical Skills, do not include it as an academic accountability component. Emphasize safety during Criterion C as part of your ATLs (Approaches to Learning) or under your classroom rules. What works to communicate a how-to the best way?

Strand C.4 – Justify Changes Made to the Plan

Honestly, most students do not reference their plan made in C.1 while building in C.2 and C.3. However, having a plan makes sense to be as prepared as possible. A written plan allows students to reflect on changes as well to deepen their understanding of problem-solving. Practices to avoid overwhelming building fronts by creating unique, organized signage, reducing the visual appearance of commercial utilities (HVAC units and utility boxes) and enhancing safety by lighting pedestrian pathways. Ensure that the development flows well with surrounding structures both in massing and design. Include space between buildings, and use various colors, textures and materials to keep visual interest.

Make sure to document all changes that are made to the criteria, as well as the rationale behind those changes. This documentation will be important for future reference. The criteria should be revisited regularly to ensure that the project is on track and that any changes that have been made are in line with the original goals.

Therefore, having the criteria will be very easy for the designers. However, it is not the only document that the designer shall follow. He shall follow and refer to other relevant standards. Design criteria should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. In other words, they should be clear and concise enough that anyone working on the project will be able to understand and follow them.

Structural loads, structural analysis and structural design are simply explained with the worked example for easiness of understanding. Element designs with notes and discussions have added to get comprehensive knowledge. Also, construction materials, shoring system design, water retaining structures, crack width calculations, etc. have discussed in addition to other aspects. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is updating its Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), which is our fair housing plan for the next five years, and we want to hear from you. Completing this survey will help HCD understand what California residents are currently experiencing and refine our goals to make affordable, safe, and stable housing more accessible.

Outlines changes made to the chosen design or plan when making the solution. Changes to plans that arise from an intent to better solve the design problem should happen in MYP Design. Unreasoned or drastic changes to plans should not be happening. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of themost exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Establishing these criteria early on will help avoid any misunderstandings or confusion down the line. Site development in terms of public space, accessibility, building entrances, public amenities, and designing with the surrounding neighborhood in mind. The California Housing and Community Development website uses Google™ Translate to provide automatic translation of its web pages. This translation application tool is provided for purposes of information and convenience only. Google™ Translate is a free third-party service, which is not controlled by the California Housing and Community Development.

Describes changes made to the chosen design and plan when making the solution. Outlines changes made to the chosen design and plan when making the solution. Designers use technical skills to physically follow the plan to make the solution. Designers shouldn't feel handcuffed by their design and should be open to thinking on the spot. Initial testing occurs during this stage and if obstacles are encountered, changes can be made to optimize and improve the original plan.